Search This Blog

1

Labels

Cancer (150) Breast (38) Study (38) Health (32) Patients (31) Treatment (27) Could (23) Therapy (19) Research (17) Against (12) Blood (11) Disease (11) linked (11) Diabetes (10) Early (10) Prevent (10) Survival (10) Treatments (7) higher (7) surgery (7) Might (6) Prostate (6) Tumors (6) During (5) Effects (5) Growth (5) Chemotherapy (4) Drinking (4) Prevention (4) Obama (3) Obesity (3) Without (3) associated (3) Experts (2) Important (2) Infection (2) About (1) Analysis (1) Causes (1) Eliminate (1) stroke (1)

AD

Showing posts with label House. Show all posts
Showing posts with label House. Show all posts

Saturday, November 16, 2013

House passes Republican health bill with 39 Democratic votes

By Mark Felsenthal and Susan Cornwell

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - In the most significant legislative rebuke to President Barack Obama's healthcare overhaul, 39 members of his Democratic Party voted for a Republican bill in the House of Representatives on Friday aimed at undermining his signature domestic policy.

The measure, which would allow insurance companies to renew and sell inexpensive, limited-coverage policies that have been canceled because they don't meet the standards of the new healthcare law that took effect on October 1, passed 261-157.

The 39 Democrats who supported the bill - nearly one-fifth of the party's caucus - reflected the alarm that spread within Obama's party this week over the political damage from the botched rollout of the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare.

Republicans have vowed to make Democratic support for the troubled law the top issue in the 2014 elections. Twenty-nine of the 39 Democrats who voted for the Republican bill are running for re-election in competitive races, according to rankings by the nonpartisan Cook Political Report.

Obama's approval ratings have plunged during the past six weeks, as the rollout of the healthcare program that is his top domestic achievement has been beset by technical glitches with the federal online insurance website designed to allow consumers to shop for policies.

In recent days, HealthCare.gov's problems have been overshadowed by reports that insurance companies were canceling the policies of millions of Americans whose policies did not meet the new law's requirements that policies cover emergency treatment, hospital stays and prescription drugs, among other things.

For years, Obama had promised that Americans would be able to keep their policies if they liked them.

But the wave of cancellations has fueled the biggest political crisis of Obama's presidency and led to an extraordinary scene at the White House on Thursday, as a contrite Obama took the blame for the healthcare program's dismal start.

He said he believed that he had to win back the confidence of the American people, and offered an administrative "fix" that would allow some people to retain their non-conforming insurance policies for at least a year.

Obama's plan dismayed some of his supporters who say that the cheap, limited-coverage plans that the new law aims to phase out often give consumers a false sense of having meaningful health coverage.

It also created concern in the insurance industry - which for years had planned the health insurance exchanges created by Obamacare - and among state insurance commissioners.

Industry advocates warned that Obama effectively was tinkering with the delicate and complex funding behind the healthcare law, and that premiums could begin soaring in 2015 if millions of consumers who were projected to be in Obamacare's health exchanges continued to hold limited-coverage policies instead.

Obama met with health insurance chief executives at the White House on Friday to discuss his proposal's potential impact on the insurance market.

"What we're going to be doing is brainstorming on how do we make sure that everybody understands what their options are," Obama told reporters in a brief photo opportunity as the meeting began. "We're going to be soliciting ideas from them."

'FRUSTRATED AND ANGERED'

Friday's bill, introduced by Republican Representative Fred Upton of Michigan, represented the latest in a series of legislative attacks on the healthcare law by the chamber, which has held more than 40 votes to limit or curtail Obamacare.

In touting his bill, Upton said that Obama "personally promised that if people liked their current health care plan, they could keep it ‘no matter what.' But cancellation notices are now arriving in millions of mailboxes across the country. It's cancellation today, sticker shock tomorrow."

It is unlikely to pass the Democrat-controlled Senate, and the White House has said Obama would veto the legislation if it reached his desk.

The House bill would allow people whose low-cost coverage was canceled to keep those policies, and also would allow insurers to continue selling policies that do not cover basic services and offer little financial help for catastrophic health events.

Critics said the House bill would undermine Obamacare's attempt to improve the healthcare system.

House Democratic opponents cast the vote as another Republican effort to sabotage the healthcare law.

Republicans "are perfectly satisfied with 40 million Americans having no health insurance at all," said Representative James McGovern, a Massachusetts Democrat. "If you want to go back to a system where the insurance companies can turn people away because they are sick, by all means vote for this bill."

But Representative Ron Barber, a Democrat from Arizona, summarized why he and 38 other Democrats voted for the Republican bill.

"I am frustrated and angered by the continuing problems with the healthcare website and I know Southern Arizonans are frustrated and angry, too," Barber said.

"Today I voted to give people the option to keep their current plan until these and other issues are resolved. That's only fair."

House Democrats were blocked in an effort to offer a scaled-down version of Upton's bill.

(Additional reporting by Roberta Rampton and Caren Bohan; Editing by Doina Chiacu, Ross Colvin and Grant McCool)


View the original article here

Friday, September 13, 2013

Unions fail to get fix from White House on key 'Obamacare' concern


View the original article here

Analysis: House Republicans go for broke in fiscal battles

By Richard Cowan and David Lawder

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Another down-to-the-wire fight, potentially more toxic than usual, is rapidly shaping up in the U.S. Congress as conservatives prepare to exploit looming fiscal deadlines to derail President Barack Obama's signature healthcare reform law.

Like previous congressional spending battles, this one involves two measures that were once relatively routine: a bill to continue funding the government to avert a shutdown, and another to increase the government's borrowing power so it can pay its debts and avoid default.

But the conflict is particularly volatile this time as, unlike the budget cuts demanded by Republicans in earlier fiscal showdowns, their demands for concessions on Obamacare on the eve of its October 1 insurance exchanges launch are non-negotiable for Democrats.

And this time, it's not just Republicans versus Democrats, but Republican against Republican. Party elders, lacking the power to make rebellious conservatives back off, have been reduced to pleading with them to do so. The conservatives, braced by the passion of Tea Party activists as the 2014 election approaches, are not inclined to cooperate.

The deadline for funding the government is September 30, when a so-called "continuing resolution" enacted last March expires. By mid-October or early November, the U.S. Treasury likely will run out of borrowing authority. Without an increase of the $16.7 trillion cap that is written into law, the federal government faces an historic default on its debt that would create havoc in global financial markets.

There is increasing talk among Republicans about a whopper bill that would fund the government from October 1 through September 30, 2014, raise the debt ceiling by giving the Treasury Department enough borrowing authority to last for a year, and impose a one-year delay of Obamacare.

"Let's give them something and we get something in exchange," Tea Party Republican Representative John Fleming of Louisiana told reporters.

It's not so simple, said Republican Senator Jeff Flake of Arizona, who spent 12 years as a House member and made his reputation as a fiscal conservative. Flake questioned his former colleague's wisdom in pushing their fight against Obamacare.

"The notion that you're going to get this (Democratic) Senate and this president to pass a repeal right now is I don't think practical," Flake said. He added, "I quit trying to understand that place (the House) as soon as I left."

FISCAL BRINKMANSHIP

Opponents to Obamacare, which will provide insurance to millions of Americans, say the law will damage healthcare as well as the nation's economy. After three years of trying and failing to repeal the law, some conservatives in the House of Representatives are willing to go for broke - literally - in their drive to prevail.

Apart from the futility of linking Obamacare to the fiscal issues, the concern of senior Republicans is that their party will take a huge public relations hit if they are blamed for the fiscal strife, as it did in the mid 1990s after successive government shutdowns precipitated by Republican budget demands.

In a CNN/ORC survey taken between September 6-8, 51 percent said Republicans would be more responsible for a shutdown, and 33 percent said Obama would take the blame.

There are risks for Democrats and Obama too. While polling results showed the public more upset with Republicans then Obama after the "fiscal cliff" fight that led to across-the-board budget cuts, Obama's Gallup approval rating started on a downward trend then from which it has yet to recover, with other polls suggesting that Americans hold all parties in Washington as well as the president responsible for "gridlock."

With the deadlines fast-approaching, the maneuvering is well underway.

The White House announced that Obama would speak to the Business Roundtable group of big-company chief executives next week. White House spokesman Jay Carney did not offer any details about what Obama will say, but he has used business groups in the past to pressure Congress to avoid fiscal brinkmanship.

"We will never accept anything that delays or defunds" Obamacare, Carney stressed again on Thursday.

In the U.S. Capitol, the top four Republican and Democratic leaders of the Senate and House met in the office of House of Representative Speaker John Boehner on Thursday to try to plot out a happy ending to their government spending and debt limit challenges.

Afterward, Boehner told reporters "there are a million options that are being discussed by a lot of people."

But while Republicans control the House, Boehner does not control Republicans.

HIGH-STAKES MANEUVER

The intra-party fight on such a high-stakes maneuver as coupling Obamacare changes to the debt limit hike is seen as pushing negotiations on the legislation right up to the October or November deadline.

In the meantime, Democrats, who control the White House and the Senate, are content to demand a no-strings-attached debt limit increase and watch Republicans tear themselves apart over this legislation, as well as the more pressing bill to keep the government running beyond September 30.

"The strategy is to watch the meltdown. This is an internal Republican dilemma, and Mr. Boehner has the hardest job in the Capitol," Democratic Representative Peter Welch, of Vermont, told Reuters.

And so, as Congress revs up for yet another gut-wrenching fiscal fight, partisan participants and non-partisan observers alike see more evidence of a dysfunctional legislature that already is the laughing stock of the country.

"The anarchists have taken over," declared Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat, referring to the fiscal fights. "We're in a position here where people who don't believe in government - and that's what the Tea Party is all about - are winning," said Reid.

Chris Krueger, of the Guggenheim Partners financial services firm, observed on Thursday: "The House Republican caucus is borderline ungovernable."

(Additional reporting by Mark Felsenthal, Rachelle Younglai and Caren Bohan; Editing by Fred Barbash and Tim Dobbyn)


View the original article here