Search This Blog

1

Labels

Cancer (150) Breast (38) Study (38) Health (32) Patients (31) Treatment (27) Could (23) Therapy (19) Research (17) Against (12) Blood (11) Disease (11) linked (11) Diabetes (10) Early (10) Prevent (10) Survival (10) Treatments (7) higher (7) surgery (7) Might (6) Prostate (6) Tumors (6) During (5) Effects (5) Growth (5) Chemotherapy (4) Drinking (4) Prevention (4) Obama (3) Obesity (3) Without (3) associated (3) Experts (2) Important (2) Infection (2) About (1) Analysis (1) Causes (1) Eliminate (1) stroke (1)

AD

Showing posts with label Obese. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Obese. Show all posts

Thursday, September 19, 2013

Obese cancer patients often shorted on chemo doses

Obese people are less likely to survive cancer, and one reason may be a surprising inequality: The overweight are undertreated.

Doctors often short them on chemotherapy by not basing the dose on size, as they should. They use ideal weight or cap the dose out of fear about how much treatment an obese patient can bear. Yet research shows that bigger people handle chemo better than smaller people do.

Even a little less chemo can mean worse odds of survival, and studies suggest that as many as 40 percent of obese cancer patients have been getting less than 85 percent of the right dose for their size.

Now, the largest organization of doctors who treat cancer, the American Society of Clinical Oncology, aims to change that. The group has adopted guidelines urging full, weight-based doses for the obese.

Don't call it supersizing; it's right-sizing cancer care, said Dr. Gary Lyman, a Duke University oncologist who led the panel that wrote the advice.

"There's little doubt that some degree of undertreatment is contributing to the higher mortality and recurrence rates in obese patients," he said.

The Food and Drug Administration's cancer drug chief, Dr. Richard Pazdur, agrees.

"By minimizing the dose, or capping the dose, we have been undertreating patients," he said.

The dosing issue applies to all types of cancer treated with chemo — breast, colon, lung, ovarian and even blood diseases such as leukemia.

It affects a lot of people. Big isn't healthy but it's the new "normal" — 60 percent of Americans are overweight and more than one-third of them are obese.

Giving too little chemo "could make it as if they didn't even get treated at all ... so they go through the whole ordeal with no benefit, in the extreme case ," said Dr. Jennifer Griggs, a University of Michigan breast cancer specialist who also worked on the guidelines.

So why do doctors limit dose?

Sometimes it's for good reason — the patient has diabetes, heart problems or other illnesses that interfere with how much chemo they can stand. Usually, though, it's because doctors are afraid to follow a standard weight-based formula because the dose seems so huge and they're afraid of harming the heart and blood system, Lyman said.

"You're three times the size of the average person, but it doesn't mean your heart is," Griggs explained.

Yet studies show that heavier patients are less likely to develop dangerous, low blood counts from cancer treatment, and that they clear chemo drugs more quickly from the body than thinner people do.

A paper Lyman published in the journal Nature in August said that a 20 percent reduction in chemo doses lowered remission and cure rates by half in animal experiments and helped the tumors develop resistance to the drugs. Other research in people found lower survival among those getting less chemo as well.

Even if a patient develops a problem from a chemo treatment and doctors have to dial it back, it's important to try a full dose the next time around so the patient gets all the treatment intended, Lyman said.

That happened to Tracy Smith, a 46-year-old Durham, N.C., woman treated at Duke in 2011 for breast cancer that had spread to more than a dozen lymph nodes. Doctors gave her full chemo doses based on her weight, which at 285 pounds classified her as obese.

Three times, high fevers put her in the hospital, and one treatment was cut short because doctors thought it was causing wheezing and possible lung damage. But she resumed and finished the intended treatment and has been cancer-free since then.

After hearing you have cancer, "you're just kind of in a fog" and don't think to ask about doses of the drugs you need, she said. "I trusted my doctor. Doctors should be well aware of what you can tolerate. You should do whatever you can to fight this beast."

Smith's tumor was fueled by estrogen — a hormone made in abundance by fat tissue. Robin McRath, a floral designer who helps run a women's shelter in Ludington, Mich., had the same type.

"It's like a playground, an amusement park, for cancer cells when you're fat," she said. She was only was 41 when her cancer was diagnosed five years ago, and her oncologist, Dr. Carol Peterson, treated her with full doses based on her weight — about 240 pounds, which put her in the obese category.

"We didn't discuss dosage. That didn't matter to me — I just wanted to get it out of my system," she said of the cancer, and praised the treatments to prevent one of chemo's most feared side effects. "There are fantastic anti-nausea medicines. I was never sick one day."

McRath is active in the Obesity Action Coalition, an education and advocacy group. A spokesman said the group was unaware of the dosing issue for obese patients.

Not all doctors are aware either. Luckily for McRath, hers was. Peterson said she uses full doses unless a patient has other health issues.

"If that's their only problem — if they're just overweight or obese — they can do quite well" with full weight-based doses, she said.

Duke's Lyman agreed, and offered this advice to patients: "Ask your doctor how they plan to treat you and whether you're going to get the full dosing. The doctor may have a good reason not to, but you should have that discussion."

___

AP National Writer Allen G. Breed in Raleigh, N.C., contributed to this report.

___

Online:

Guidelines: http://www.asco.org/guidelines/wbd

___

Follow Marilynn Marchione on Twitter at http://twitter.com/MMarchioneAP


View the original article here

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Childbirth risks not the same for all obese women

Sep. 10, 2013 — Obesity raises the chances of complications and medical interventions in childbirth. But a new study by Oxford University shows the risks are not the same for all obese women.

For otherwise healthy women, the increase in risk with obesity may not be as great as previously suspected.

'The increased risk was fairly modest for obese women who did not have conditions such as high blood pressure, diabetes or a previous caesarean section, and the risks were quite low if the woman had given birth previously,' says lead researcher Dr Jennifer Hollowell of the National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit at Oxford University.

'It is important to appreciate that we are not saying that obesity isn't important or that obesity doesn't increase a woman's risks during pregnancy,' she adds. 'We found that around half of very obese women giving birth in obstetric units have medical problems or pregnancy complications when admitted. But our study focused on women who were obese but otherwise healthy when they went into labour, and some of them had much lower risks than might have been expected.'

The Oxford University researchers point out that, among healthy women with a straightforward pregnancy, childbirth risks are influenced more by whether someone is a first-time mum than whether they are obese.

They found that the chances of first-time mums of normal weight having medical interventions or complications during childbirth are greater than for 'very obese' but otherwise healthy women having a second or subsequent child. The findings are published in the British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

Dr Hollowell comments: 'This finding does highlight a possible anomaly in the guidance given to women on where to give birth.'

First-time mothers with low-risk pregnancies can plan to have their child in hospital, at home, in a free-standing midwife-led unit or an alongside midwifery unit connected to a hospital -- according to what is available where they are.

However, current guidelines suggest all women with a body mass index (BMI) over 35 should be advised to have the birth in an obstetric unit to reduce risk.

Guidelines on assessing risks for women in planning births take no account of whether a woman is having their first child or has already had children.

'We think that the guidelines might need to be reviewed to take account of this more nuanced understanding of the effect of obesity,' says Dr Hollowell. 'We think it's worth considering whether it might be safe to allow some healthy obese women having a second baby the option of a birth in an alongside midwifery unit where obstetric and neonatal care is available on site if needed.'

The researchers investigated the influence of BMI on the chances of healthy women having any type of complication during labour and childbirth that would need hospital care -- either in an obstetric unit for the mother or a neonatal unit for the baby.

This included a range of medical interventions and complications that varied in urgency and severity, ranging from being given drugs to help with labour progressing slowly, through to having a caesarean section or assisted delivery by forceps or ventouse, significant loss of blood resulting in a blood transfusion, and the baby being admitted to a neonatal unit.

The researchers included data for 17,230 women who'd had straightforward pregnancies and had no medical conditions that might influence risks at labour and birth.

Around half of obese women planning a normal birth after a straightforward pregnancy have no medical or obstetric risk factors such as diabetes or high blood pressure, so this is an important group to study.

The risks of complications during childbirth did go up with increasing body mass index among these healthy women. But the researchers found the increase was modest. Overweight, obese or very obese women showed a relative increase in risk of 6-12% compared to women with a normal BMI.

Most of the additional risk of needing treatment was accounted for by giving drugs for slow labour among those with a high body mass index, though risks of serious outcomes for mother and baby were also increased.

However, whether a woman has had a previous baby plays a larger role in influencing the chances of needing hospital care. 53% of women of normal weight having their first baby had an intervention or a complication at birth. The figure was 21% for very obese but otherwise healthy women having a second or subsequent baby.


View the original article here