Search This Blog

1

Labels

Cancer (150) Breast (38) Study (38) Health (32) Patients (31) Treatment (27) Could (23) Therapy (19) Research (17) Against (12) Blood (11) Disease (11) linked (11) Diabetes (10) Early (10) Prevent (10) Survival (10) Treatments (7) higher (7) surgery (7) Might (6) Prostate (6) Tumors (6) During (5) Effects (5) Growth (5) Chemotherapy (4) Drinking (4) Prevention (4) Obama (3) Obesity (3) Without (3) associated (3) Experts (2) Important (2) Infection (2) About (1) Analysis (1) Causes (1) Eliminate (1) stroke (1)

AD

Showing posts with label court. Show all posts
Showing posts with label court. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 25, 2013

Romanian court backs stray dog cull

By Luiza Ilie and Christian Lowe

BUCHAREST (Reuters) - Romania's top court ruled in favor of a law to kill tens of thousands of stray dogs from the streets of Bucharest on Wednesday after a four-year-old boy was mauled to death earlier this month.

The boy's death triggered street protests demanding action against the capital's more than 60,000 strays, who bite dozens of people every day and are also a deterrent for tourism.

Parliament overwhelmingly backed a law that allows local administrations to put down dogs caught in public spaces if they are not adopted within two weeks. Animal rights groups, however, have protested for the dogs to be saved and a group of lawmakers challenged the law in the Constitutional Court.

Prime Minister Victor Ponta welcomed the court's ruling in favor of the law on Wednesday.

"You cannot postpone a decision between a kid's life and a dog's life," he told Reuters. "It is very clear that the decision should be to protect people's life."

Hundreds of animal rights' protesters gathered outside the court to protest, chanting "May you get the dogs' fate" and carrying banners that said "Red card for Romania", "Choose life" and "We are not a criminal nation." Protests were set to continue.

"We will consult lawyers and if possible ... we will attack the decision at the international level," said Kuki Barbuceanu, project coordinator for the local unit of Vier Pfoten, an animal welfare organization.

In previous failed campaigns to cull the strays local and international animal rights groups have argued that sterilization and adoption were the solution.

Ponta said he hoped that local authorities would look at adoption or finding shelter for the dogs first, and use the option to kill them "very rarely".

Strays are thought to be a legacy of late communist dictator Nicolae Ceausescu's decision to bulldoze pre-World War Two houses in Bucharest's historic center in the 1980s to make way for the parliament building, one of the largest in the world.

In the process, thousands of guard dogs were abandoned by residents who had been forcibly relocated into small apartments.

In 2006, a 68-year-old Japanese businessman bled to death in central Bucharest after a stray dog bit him in the leg. Two years ago, a woman in her 50s died of multiple wounds after being attacked by a pack of dogs.

(Editing by Susan Fenton)


View the original article here

Friday, September 13, 2013

U.S. court temporarily blocks a competitor to AstraZeneca's Nexium

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A federal U.S. judge issued a temporary injunction against Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co Ltd on Friday, preventing the South Korean drugmaker from launching a close relative of AstraZeneca Plc's Nexium stomach-acid drug in the United States.

Judge Timothy Dyk of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit approved AstraZeneca's request for the injunction on Friday. He ordered Hanmi to respond within a week and AstraZeneca to reply no later than September 24.

AstraZeneca has accused its South Korean rival of patent infringement for developing Esomezol, a drug that treats gastroesophageal reflux disease, which is caused by stomach acid moving up into the esophagus.

In August, Hanmi received tentative approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for Esomezol, which was developed based on Nexium.

Hanmi's potential encroachment poses a threat to AstraZeneca, which is facing the near-term expiration of U.S. patents covering its two top-selling drugs - Nexium, which loses U.S. protection in 2014, and the cholesterol pill Crestor, which will go off-patent in 2016. As a result, sales at the company are set to fall by several billion dollars.

(Reporting by Lauren Tara LaCapra in New York, Deena Beasley in Los Angeles and Zeba Siddiqui in Bangalore; Editing by Tim Dobbyn)


View the original article here

Tuesday, July 3, 2012

Canada abortion foe may be treated as criminal: court

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

OTTAWA (Reuters) - The province of Ontario was within its rights to press criminal charges against a grandmother who has spent 10 of the last 18 years in jail for defying court orders not to demonstrate outside abortion clinics, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled on Friday.

Linda Gibbons, 63, appealed to the Supreme Court last year on a technicality, arguing that disobeying a court order should not be punished under the Criminal Code.

Gibbons, who had an abortion in 1970 before becoming convinced that abortion was wrong, argued that she should not get a criminal record for penalties imposed by Ontario courts. The Supreme Court disagreed in an 8-1 decision.

"It's a huge victory for women," said Maria Corsillo, manager of the Scott abortion clinic in Toronto where Gibbons was arrested in 2008. The clinic performs about 2,000 abortions a year.

"They (women) have the right to access health care without having to run a gauntlet through people who want to impose their views on them."

Due to the Supreme Court's decision, the case against Gibbons in connection with her activities at the Scott clinic will now go to trial.

Under what was supposed to be a temporary injunction in 1994, Gibbons is not allowed to come within 60 feet of a number of Toronto clinics.

She is currently in a Toronto prison in connection with another bubble-zone violation and was not available for comment.

Santoro said Gibbons would continue her fight in the courts, arguing that it is "an abuse of process" for police to continue to make use of an 18-year-old temporary court order.

"She's a peaceful protester, and she's never caused any trouble," said her lawyer, Daniel Santoro. Corsillo said Gibbons would sometimes approach women arriving at the Scott clinic and tell them, "Your baby loves you; don't do it."

Canada has no law on abortion and Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper has promised not to reopen the issue.

The name of the case is Linda Dale Gibbons v. Her Majesty the Queen (33813).

(Reporting by Randall Palmer; Editing by Peter Galloway)

Monday, July 2, 2012

Fate of 'uninsurables' hinges on Supreme Court

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

WASHINGTON (AP) — Cancer patient Kathy Watson voted Republican in 2008 and believes the government has no right telling Americans to get health insurance. Nonetheless, she says she'd be dead if it weren't for President Barack Obama's health care law.

Now the Florida small businesswoman is worried the Supreme Court will strike down her lifeline. Under the law, Watson and nearly 62,000 other "uninsurable" patients are getting coverage through a little-known program for people who have been turned away by insurance companies because of pre-existing medical conditions.

"Without it, I would have been dead on March 2," Watson said of the Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan, known as PCIP. That's when she was hospitalized for a life-threatening respiratory infection.

It's not clear how the Supreme Court will rule on Obama's law, but Watson's case illustrates the potential impact of tying everything in the far-reaching legislation to the fate of one provision, the unprecedented requirement that most Americans carry health insurance.

The law's opponents say if that insurance mandate is found to be unconstitutional, the rest of the law should also go, since courts should not be picking and choosing policy. The administration defends the insurance requirement but says if the court decides to overturn it, most of the rest of the law should stay.

State officials who administer the federal pre-existing condition plan in 27 states are trying to make fallback arrangements in case the law is invalidated and coverage suddenly terminates.

"Some of these individuals are critically ill and are being treated for very serious illnesses, whether it be cancer or HIV-AIDS, and we feel a responsibility to them to do what we can to see they don't lose access," said Amie Goldman, who oversees PCIP in Wisconsin.

Federal officials who administer the plan in the remaining 23 states and Washington, D.C., remain mum on what might happen there if the law is overturned.

The White House line is that Obama is confident the Supreme Court will uphold the Affordable Care Act, and his administration therefore is making no contingency plans for a reversal. None of that sounds reassuring to Watson, who owns a medical transport service in rural north-central Florida.

"It's scary," she said. "They need to look at this carefully because it is going to affect a lot of people with a lot of bad conditions who are not going to have any health care coverage."

Before PCIP, Watson had been uninsured since 2003, originally turned down because of elevated white blood cells. About three years ago, she was diagnosed with a chronic form of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, a cancer of the immune system. Unable to afford medications, she relied on the emergency room to treat flare-ups.

She tried applying to a major insurance company for a small business plan for her and her employees, and was quickly rejected. Then she heard about PCIP.

The temporary program is meant to serve as a patch until 2014, when the federal health care law will require insurers to accept all applicants, including cancer patients like Watson, regardless of medical history. The law's controversial mandate for individuals to carry health insurance is related to that guaranteed acceptance provision. By forcing healthy people to buy insurance, it would help keep premiums in check.

Initially, Watson could not afford the $800 monthly premium the government was asking for PCIP. High premiums are part of the reason the program has not attracted more people.

But officials retooled to make coverage more affordable. Watson applied again and was accepted. She met the basic requirements: uninsured at least six months, turned away because of pre-existing conditions, having U.S. citizenship or legal residence. Her premium is $363.

In March, Watson went to the emergency room with what she thought was pneumonia. She was admitted, and quarantined the next morning when tests showed she had an antibiotic-resistant bacterial infection, highly dangerous. She spent five days in intensive care.

Without her PCIP coverage, Watson is convinced she would have been sent home from the emergency room after initial treatment to ease her shortness of breath.

"I'm not a candidate for any for type of indigent program, and without insurance they would not have put me in ICU," she said.

"I would have gone into cardiac arrest and probably died," she added. Emergency rooms must treat the uninsured, "but they are only required to get you stable. And then they release you and tell you to go to the health department."

A government report this year found that people in the pre-existing condition plan tended to be middle-aged patients with no access to employer coverage and with medical conditions that require continuous care. The top five diagnoses: cancer, heart disease, degenerative bone diseases, organ failure requiring a transplant and hemophilia.

If the federal law is struck down, some state officials are considering taking the patients into their own, separate, state high-risk insurance pools. Wisconsin, for example, has decided that PCIP enrollees would be automatically accepted into its pool. But not all states have them. In the 35 that do, premiums would generally be higher, and there might be waiting periods.

Republicans, including presidential candidate Mitt Romney, have long favored insurance pools for high-risk patients. And Congress could take emergency action to keep PCIP going. But no assurances have been offered. Michael Steel, a spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner, says Republicans are ready to work on "step-by-step, commonsense" approaches.

Watson says she still disagrees with Obama's requirement that individuals have health insurance, either through an employer, a government program or by purchasing their own plan. "I approve of some of it," she said of the law, "I don't approve of the mandatory ... insurance."

But she doesn't want to go back to depending on the emergency room.

"I have no problem paying my insurance and paying my copays," she said. "I just think I should have the right to purchase insurance."

___

Online:

Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan: https://www.pcip.gov/